Advance directive execution requirements, by state
Witness counts, notarisation, witness eligibility, and electronic execution — each field cited to a statute or state agency publication. Unverified jurisdictions are marked and never guessed.
Last reviewed against the FDA label and SPRAVATO REMS programme materials on .
What is generally true — and why “generally” matters
In most U.S. jurisdictions an advance directive or healthcare proxy needs adult witnesses, often two. In many of those, an employee of the treating facility cannot be one of them — which can rule out the nurse at the bedside. Notarisation is required in some states, optional as an alternative in others, and silent in others. Electronic execution is explicitly authorised in a minority of states, restricted by in-presence rules in others, and simply not addressed in most. “Generally” is doing real work in every one of those sentences. Use the lookup for your jurisdiction.
Check your state’s requirements
No patient data. No email gate. Choose a jurisdiction and the sourced findings appear immediately. Unverified states refuse to guess.
Select a state to see sourced execution requirements. The full summary table below is available without using this tool.
What the requirements actually are and why they exist
Witnesses
Witness formalities are meant to reduce fraud, coercion, and later disputes about capacity at the moment of signing. Statutes typically require competent adult witnesses who are present when the declarant signs (or acknowledges a signature). The number is usually two; a few states use one witness with a notary alternative (for example Arizona and Minnesota for certain instruments).
Notarisation
Some states treat a notary acknowledgment as an alternative to witnesses (Texas, California, Ohio, Tennessee, and others in our verified set). A smaller set requires both witnesses and a notary (North Carolina living will; South Carolina declaration for a natural death). Where the statute is silent, notarisation may still be good practice — but this site will not invent a requirement the statute does not state.
Witness eligibility — including facility employees
Eligibility rules are where bedside operations break. Common exclusions include:
- the appointed agent or surrogate
- relatives by blood or marriage
- heirs or people entitled to the estate
- the attending physician
- employees of the treating facility or of the attending physician
Texas Health & Safety Code § 166.003 is a clear example of the facility-employee exclusion. Florida requires that at least one of two witnesses not be a spouse or blood relative. If your unit’s informal practice is “the charge nurse can witness,” check the statute — that practice is unlawful in a large share of states.
Electronic execution
See Can an advance directive be signed electronically?. The short version: do not assume E-SIGN makes a phone signature valid for a living will or healthcare proxy. Look for directive-specific authority. Where the statute is silent, escalate.
POLST / MOLST
POLST-type forms are a different regime (medical orders, usually clinician-signed). This lookup marks POLST as not yet verified in v1 rather than forcing living-will rules onto a different instrument.
Verified jurisdictions — summary
Alabama
- Instrument checked
- Living will / AD
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Permitted
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- Often restricted — see exclusions
- Citation
- Ala. Code § 22-8A-4
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
Arizona
- Instrument checked
- Living will / AD
- Witnesses
- 1
- Notarisation
- Permitted
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- See exclusions
- Citation
- A.R.S. § 36-3221 (one adult witness or notary)
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
California
- Instrument checked
- Living will / AD
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Permitted
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- Often restricted — see exclusions
- Citation
- Cal. Prob. Code § 4673–4675
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
Colorado
- Instrument checked
- Living will / AD
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Permitted
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- Often restricted — see exclusions
- Citation
- C.R.S. § 15-18-104
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
Connecticut
- Instrument checked
- Living will / AD
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Not addressed in statute
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- See exclusions
- Citation
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 19a-575a
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
District of Columbia
- Instrument checked
- Healthcare POA / proxy
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Not addressed in statute
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- Often restricted — see exclusions
- Citation
- D.C. Code § 21-2207
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
Florida
- Instrument checked
- Living will / AD
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Not addressed in statute
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- See exclusions
- Citation
- Fla. Stat. § 765.302
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
Georgia
- Instrument checked
- Living will / AD
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Not addressed in statute
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- Often restricted — see exclusions
- Citation
- O.C.G.A. § 31-32-5
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
Illinois
- Instrument checked
- Living will / AD
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Not addressed in statute
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- See exclusions
- Citation
- 755 ILCS 35/3
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
Indiana
- Instrument checked
- Living will / AD
- Witnesses
- 1
- Notarisation
- Not addressed in statute
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- See exclusions
- Citation
- IC 16-36-4-8 (one adult witness for living will declaration historically; confirm current text)
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
Louisiana
- Instrument checked
- Living will / AD
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Permitted
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- See exclusions
- Citation
- La. R.S. 40:1151.2
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
Maryland
- Instrument checked
- Living will / AD
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Not addressed in statute
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- Often restricted — see exclusions
- Citation
- Md. Code, Health-Gen. § 5-602
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
Massachusetts
- Instrument checked
- Healthcare POA / proxy
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Not addressed in statute
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- See exclusions
- Citation
- M.G.L. c. 201D § 2
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
Michigan
- Instrument checked
- Healthcare POA / proxy
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Not addressed in statute
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- Often restricted — see exclusions
- Citation
- MCL 700.5506
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
Minnesota
- Instrument checked
- Healthcare POA / proxy
- Witnesses
- 1
- Notarisation
- Permitted
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- Often restricted — see exclusions
- Citation
- Minn. Stat. § 145C.03 (one witness or notary)
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
Missouri
- Instrument checked
- Living will / AD
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Not addressed in statute
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- See exclusions
- Citation
- Mo. Rev. Stat. § 459.015
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
Nevada
- Instrument checked
- Living will / AD
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Permitted
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- Often restricted — see exclusions
- Citation
- NRS 449A.433 et seq.
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
New Jersey
- Instrument checked
- Living will / AD
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Permitted
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- See exclusions
- Citation
- N.J.S.A. 26:2H-56
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
New York
- Instrument checked
- Living will / AD
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Not addressed in statute
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- See exclusions
- Citation
- NYS DOH guidance — living will is non-statutory; two-witness execution is the common practice hospitals recognise alongside a Proxy
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
North Carolina
- Instrument checked
- Living will / AD
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Required
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- Often restricted — see exclusions
- Citation
- N.C.G.S. § 90-321
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
Ohio
- Instrument checked
- Living will / AD
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Permitted
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- Often restricted — see exclusions
- Citation
- Ohio Rev. Code § 2133.02
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
Oklahoma
- Instrument checked
- Living will / AD
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Not addressed in statute
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- Often restricted — see exclusions
- Citation
- 63 O.S. § 3101.4
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
Oregon
- Instrument checked
- Living will / AD
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Permitted
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- Often restricted — see exclusions
- Citation
- ORS 127.515
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
Pennsylvania
- Instrument checked
- Living will / AD
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Not addressed in statute
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- Often restricted — see exclusions
- Citation
- 20 Pa.C.S. § 5442
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
South Carolina
- Instrument checked
- Living will / AD
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Required
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- Often restricted — see exclusions
- Citation
- S.C. Code § 44-77-40
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
Tennessee
- Instrument checked
- Living will / AD
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Permitted
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- Often restricted — see exclusions
- Citation
- T.C.A. § 32-11-104
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
Texas
- Instrument checked
- Living will / AD
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Permitted
- Electronic execution
- Permitted
- Facility / provider witness issue
- Often restricted — see exclusions
- Citation
- Tex. Health & Safety Code § 166.032–.033
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
Virginia
- Instrument checked
- Living will / AD
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Not addressed in statute
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- See exclusions
- Citation
- Va. Code § 54.1-2983
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
Washington
- Instrument checked
- Living will / AD
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Permitted
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- Often restricted — see exclusions
- Citation
- RCW 70.122.030
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
Wisconsin
- Instrument checked
- Living will / AD
- Witnesses
- 2
- Notarisation
- Not addressed in statute
- Electronic execution
- Not addressed in statute
- Facility / provider witness issue
- See exclusions
- Citation
- Wis. Stat. § 154.03
- Last checked
- 2026-07-18
Only verified jurisdictions appear here (30 as of 2026-07-18). Unverified states are available in the lookup as disabled options with links to the state health department. Status words are text in the cell — colour is never the sole carrier on this site.
When to escalate rather than rely on this page
Escalate to your facility’s risk management or legal team when:
- a document has already been signed and anyone is unsure whether it is valid
- the patient is in a skilled nursing facility or other setting with extra witness rules (California is a known example)
- the instrument is from another state (reciprocity is out of scope for this reference)
- the family is asking you to confirm validity of a specific signed paper or phone signature
- electronic execution is not addressed in statute for your state and someone wants a yes/no answer anyway
This site describes what published statutes and agencies say. It does not validate a specific document. A false “yes, that’s fine” is worse than no answer.
Common questions
- Why is my state disabled in the dropdown?
- We only enable jurisdictions we have verified against a statute or state agency publication for the fields we show. We would rather show “not yet verified” with a link to your health department than ship a plausible guess about end-of-life document formalities.
- Does two witnesses mean the nurse can be one of them?
- Often no. Many states exclude employees of the treating facility, the attending physician, the agent, relatives, or heirs. The exclusions list in the lookup result is usually the most operationally important line on the page.
- Is notarisation always required?
- No. Some states require it, some allow it as an alternative to witnesses, and some are silent. The lookup labels each of those statuses explicitly.
- Can I print this for the unit?
- Yes. Use Copy or Print on a lookup result. The disclaimer, citations, and last-checked dates are included in the plain-text output on purpose — a pinboard copy that loses its caveats is how a reference becomes a liability.
This is wrong for my state
Hospital risk managers and state-law practitioners are the highest-quality correction source we can get. If a row is wrong, send the statute section and we will fix it.
Get in touch
Sources
- Texas Health & Safety Code chapter 166 (Advance Directives) (opens in a new tab) — Texas Legislature
- Texas HHS advance directive forms (electronic signature notice) (opens in a new tab) — Texas Health and Human Services
- New York Public Health Law § 2981 (Health Care Proxy execution) (opens in a new tab) — New York State Senate
- California Probate Code § 4673 (Advance health care directive execution) (opens in a new tab) — California Legislative Information
- Florida Statutes chapter 765 (Health Care Advance Directives) (opens in a new tab) — Florida Legislature
- Advance directives by state (forms and state variation overview) (opens in a new tab) — CaringInfo / National Alliance for Care at Home
- Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (E-SIGN) (opens in a new tab) — Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (15 U.S.C. ch. 96, E-SIGN Act summary mirror)
- Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) (opens in a new tab) — Uniform Law Commission (Uniform Electronic Transactions Act)
Last reviewed against the FDA label and SPRAVATO REMS programme materials on .